Headline News

Crawford to Cardinals

    Excitement was the word of the day at the spring training location of the St. Louis Cardinals. A press conference was held to welcome back OF Carl Crawford. Crawford was reacquired by the Cardinals in a six player trade with the Atlanta Braves. From 2006-2008, Crawford missed a grand total of 26 games and had 199 stolen bases during that time. Crawford is third all time on the Cardinals stole bases list behind Cardinals stalwart SS Jimmy Rollins and all time FCBL stolen bases leader Juan Pierre. The trade did not come without cost. The Cardinals had to give up promising first baseman Kendry Morales and the third pick in the upcoming draft. To say manager Brian Cramer was thrilled with that price was a major understatement. “The Cardinals are elated to welcome back Carl Crawford to St. Louis. He is one of my all time favorite players, and he is an even better person.” Cramer addressed the upcoming season with reporters also. “I’m really happy with the direction of this team for this season. As much as I hated losing Kendry, with this trade we can move Dunn back to the DH position and Carl into LF where he belongs. Carl is one of the best, if not the best defensive OF in this league. This also solidifies our leadoff hitter spot in the lineup. Before this trade, I was considering David Wright as the leadoff hitter. As great a hitter David is, I don’t think there is any arguing Crawford is a much better suited to leadoff.” The question was brought to Cramer as to whether or not his team could knock off the Braves. While nothing could ruin his jubilant mood, you could tell he wasn’t comfortable with the question. “Look, we just need to concentrate on the things we do well, and hopefully everything else falls into place. Not only do the Braves look better than ever, the Padres pitching staff might be the best in our league, and also let’s not forget a legendary FCBL manager took over the Angels team. They aren’t looking to shabby either. The whole division is better, and is the best in our league. It should be a fun year.”
   
   
   
   
Cardinals Management  - 2/28/2010 12:00:00 AM

MLB Decade review

    I am in the process of using the computer formula I used to rank all of the NBA teams in my book, “The NBA From Top to Bottom,” to rank all of the teams in MLB history. I started with the 2009 season and am working my way backward. I just finished the recently-completed decade and thought it would be interesting to share some of the findings. Why listen to these ratings? Historically, the system does a better job of projecting league champions than regular season records.
    BEST TEAM OF THE DECADE: 2007 Boston Red Sox An interesting fact about the 2000s: Only 1.5 teams that had the best record in a season went on to win the World Series. (The Red Sox and Indians tied for the best record in 2007, thus the half). The 2007 Red Sox were one of those teams. The 2009 Yankees were the other. The 2007 Red Sox outscored their opponents by 210 runs. The 2009 Yankees outscored their opponents by just 162 runs. My vote for team of the decade goes to the 2007 Red Sox. WORST TEAM OF THE DECADE: 2003 Detroit Tigers And it’s not even close. The 2003 Tigers were 43-119 and were outscored by 337 runs. The had to win five of their last six to crack the 40-win “barrier.” It makes you appreciate the job Jim Leyland did to get this team into the World Series just three years later.
    BEST TEAM NOT TO WIN A WORLD SERIES: 2001 Seattle Mariners The computer ranks them as the best team of the decade. Lest we forget, the 2001 Mariners were 116-46 and probably one of the top five regular season teams of all time. Why they fell apart in the playoffs – they barely got by Cleveland in the first round and lost in five against the Yankees in the ALCS – is still a mystery to me. WORST TEAM TO WIN A WORLD SERIES: 2006 St. Louis Cardinals I have the 2006 Cardinals as the 177th-best team of the 2000s. That said, the Cardinals probably deserved to win a World Series in the 2000s – they won 100 games in 2004 and 2005 – so this championship didn’t bother me very much.
    BEST TEAM TO MISS THE PLAYOFFS: 2002 Boston Red Sox I have this team as the seventh-best of the whole decade, but they couldn’t even make the playoffs. Reason: Six American League teams won 93 or more games in 2002, and only four teams can make the playoffs. WORST TEAM TO MAKE THE PLAYOFFS: 2005 San Diego Padres The Padres squeaked in with an 82-80 record. The computer rates them 221st of 300 teams in the 2000s. They were outscored by 42 runs over the course of the season, but no one else in the NL West had a winning record that year so San Diego got in.
    BEST FRANCHISE OF THE DECADE: New York Yankees Nine playoffs appearances, four World Series appearances, two World Series titles, most wins total … yes, they probably should have gotten more bang for their buck, but you can’t deny the Yankees were the team everyone feared most in the 2000s. The computer gives the Yankees the best 10-year average rating of the decade by a smidge over the Boston Red Sox. WORST FRANCHISE OF THE DECADE: Kansas City Royals Seven 60-win seasons, two 50-win seasons, and they did it against arguably the easiest schedule in baseball. The AL Central is the one division without a team with a significant monetary advantage, and the Royals in no way took advantage of that opportunity. The computer gives the Royals the worst 10-year average of the decade, by a healthy margin over the Pittsburgh Pirates.
Kyle Wright  - 1/7/2010 12:00:00 AM

Message Board

Schmidt
We already voted on our all FCBL team of all time and Michael Jack won then too.
Signed: Thome  Time: 3/10/2010 5:25:16 PM  Ip:



who am I
Rick Porcello?
Signed: Thome  Time: 3/10/2010 5:23:52 PM  Ip:



I agree
That is exactly what I was going to say. Thanks Kyle!
Signed: Cory  Time: 3/10/2010 3:40:00 PM  Ip:



I vote for Schmidt
By most measures, you would pick Schmidt. There's a relatively new stat called win shares that I really like that measures how many wins a player produces for his team. I like this stat because it rewards players who contribute to good teams and punishes players who put up big numbers for crappy teams. Anyway, Schmidt and Brett are the top two third basemen of all time based on win shares. Schmidt is credited with 468 wins. Brett is credited with 432 wins. Under certain circumstances you might pick Brett - let's say you were putting together a team and you needed a 3rd baseman to hit second; then you should pick Brett. But under most circumstances, your choice would be Michael Jack.
Signed: Padres GM  Time: 3/10/2010 3:07:09 PM  Ip:



Interesting
Ok who is better George Brett or Mike Schmidt?
Signed: Bill  Time: 3/10/2010 11:24:52 AM  Ip:



Reds on TV
Hey also if you have the mlb network they will be replaying the Reds game at 7pm.
Signed: Goodwin  Time: 3/5/2010 4:58:23 PM  Ip:



Baseball is Here!
First spring training game for the Redlegs is this afternoon at 305 on 700 WLW! Hope you'll all be listening to the 2010 WS Champs open up another wire-to-wire season!
Signed: Cincinnati Reds Fan #2  Time: 3/5/2010 1:36:38 PM  Ip:



Presidency
DON'T BLAME ME, I VOTED FOR THE AMERICAN
Signed: CONCERNED US CITIZEN  Time: 3/5/2010 12:21:02 AM  Ip:



Lets get started
What else is there to discuss though? Is it not ok for me to write a post and sign my name to it?
Signed: The Cleveland Indians  Time: 3/4/2010 10:18:05 PM  Ip:



Post
I agree with Thome and Ichiro - the post should not have been removed. If a manager has a beef with the league, they should be allowed to bring that beef forward. It is not up to the commissioner to censor the thoughts and opinions of the league managers. “Pontius Pilate was the first great censor and Jesus Christ the first great victim of censorship”
Signed: Lamont  Time: 3/4/2010 10:14:23 PM  Ip: